The Reconstruction of Eurpoe After World War II essays

The Reconstruction of Eurpoe After World War II papers THE RECONSTRUCTION OF EUROPE AFTER WORLD WAR II Indeed, even while World War II war despite everything being battled, pioneers of the Allied forces started considering how to remake Europe after the war. Winston Churchill of Britain, Franklin Roosevelt of the United States, and Joseph Stalin of the Soviet Union concurred above all else, that they would need to uncover one party rule totally. This implied they would need to vanquish Germany as well as need to denazify Germany by rebuffing the individuals who were dependable. Coming out of the Second World War which totally demolished and injured Europe, numerous nations needed to confront the issues of material, financial and moral recreation. This report shows how the nations approached revamping a destroyed Europe. On June sixth 1947 George c Marshall introduced a discourse of an arrangement the eternity changed Europe. It was an arrangement to remake the destructed Europe after World War II. ?Borne from the psyche of an insightful and carefully talented visionary, the Marshall Plan was the phoenix on whose wings war desolated Europe would start its climb from the remains of World War II. The Plan flourished in the Economic Cooperation Administration (ECA) made by Congress in April 1948. Its official title was the European Recovery Program. It is known as the Marshall Plan, notwithstanding, to pay tribute to its maker - Secretary of State George C. Marshall. Establishing one of our country's best for eign strategy minutes, the Marshall Plan flagged America's unequivocal purpose to help a monetarily battling Europe, and accept a place of authority on the post-WWII stage. Watching the money related emergencies which had constrained Britain to pull out of Greece, the gigantic European capital deficiencies, helpless harvest conditions, rising expansion, and the sprouting seeds of socialist gatherings in France and Italy, Secretary of State Marshall was resolved not to rehash the missteps of World War I by essentially holding on as terrible occasions turned more regrettable. At the Harvard U... <!

Moral and Ethical Role of Government

Good and Ethical Role of Government Morals and profound quality structure a focal situation in the working of the administration. Under ordinary conditions, it is the job of the administration to guarantee an equitable society where request and amicability exist. Thus the legislature needs to set up and implement moral and good guidelines in order to guarantee that the general public capacities well. Dynamic is the administrations boss job. In this manner it must make moral and good contemplations so as to settle on choices that are in accordance with the government assistance of the general public. Morals and ethical quality are utilized reciprocally. The two terms are connected in a few different ways. In any case, there is an irrelevant disparity connecting the two. Most normally is the way that profound quality goes further than morals in characterizing human conduct and lead. Morals allude to the measures that make the general public a superior spot of all while profound quality accommodate increasingly more profound contemplations that add up to religion and otherworldliness. All together for the administration to guarantee that moral principles are clung to, morals and parts of profound quality are dug in into the law. This makes it advantageously conceivable to uphold moral norms and guarantee that all individuals fit in with the law. In any case, certain parts of morals and ethical quality can't be made lawful. This will make the general public increasingly convoluted since certain profound quality perspectives and morals are keen. This brings into point of view the feature of conviction and religion which plans various individuals to hold different perspectives on the idea of morals and profound quality. The consequence is that, the administration assumes a noteworthy job in implementing morals and ethical quality. Thus it is normal that the pioneers guarantee that the general public is simply and deliberate for all. The point of this paper is to fundamentally look at the job of the administration in profound quality a morals. To prevail in this undertaking, the paper will talk about various parts of profound quality and morals. Job of Government One of the focal reasons for the administration is to uphold the law. The law speaks to the desire of the individuals who have their own social and moral impression of the real world. Subsequently the legislature implements the moral and virtues of the individuals it oversees. As such it very well may be appropriately said that the administration serves to achieve the people groups impression of reality as spoke to in their moral and virtues. This makes the job of the administration increasingly complex not overlooking that not all estimations of moral and good thought can be implemented by the legislature. Be that as it may, the administration remains the prime overseer of people groups esteems. Morals and virtues impact the activity of the general public. It is in this manner genuine that the administration practices power over the general public. This is valid considering the errand of implementing laws. So as to show signs of improvement comprehension of the job of the legislature undoubtedly; more spotlight ought to be on the law (Preston Bishop 2000). The law is the legislatures instrument of intensity. To play out its capacities, the legislature depends significantly on the law. Then again the law is seen as being illustrative of the moral, social and virtues of the individuals. In this manner as much as the law probably won't be the ideal device of authorizing moral and virtues, it remains the administrations boss weapon against corrupt practices and indecency. The law depicts what is correct and adequate in the public arena and subsequently gives a blue print towards a moral and just society. So as to confirm their journey for an equitable society, residents are required to hold fast to the arrangements of the law. In this manner, the law ties the general public together bringing amicability among various individuals. Inability to fit in with the law is seen as breaking moral gauges set up and is along these lines culpable. Along these lines, the law is seen as the people groups will to be upheld by the legislature. There are a great deal of difficulties the administration faces in its moral and good jobs. Above all else are the various impression of morals and profound quality. This is coupled by the down to earth reality that the law doesn't completely speak to moral and good measures. Recognitions are an extraordinary danger to the administrations job. This is because of the way that specific parameters which are legitimate are here and there apparent as damaging moral and good measures. A genuine model is the issue of premature birth. As much as premature birth may be legitimized, it despite everything stays an easy to refute moral issue. This is because of the way that it is seen by certain individuals in the public arena as untrustworthy. Different issues incorporate separation and wantonness. These contentions underline the way that the law is certifiably not an adequate instrument of authorizing moral and virtues. It underscores the disappointment of the legislature to guarantee an only society through authorizing the law. Moral and Social Obligations Morals and a general public are indistinguishable, because of the way that moral norms are the glue of a sound society. In this way there can never be a general public without guidelines that characterize conduct and lead. An equitable society can just exist in accordance with a lot of qualities that speak to the moral and virtues of the individuals. A general public then again is represented by a gathering of pioneers through the establishment of government (Kizza, 2010). Consequently, clearly it is the job of the legislature to guarantee that the general public is simply and systematic. This is what is alluded to as social commitments of the administration. Basically the administration is an instrument of the general public. It is set up by the general public to oversee it and uphold laws that are regarded to speak to the desires, qualities and feelings of the individuals. The legislatures social commitments are only the elements of guaranteeing that moral and good norms are clung to in like manner. This includes the undertaking of guaranteeing that the laws set speak to the moral and virtues of the individuals. Then again, the administration needs to go past the institutional job of authorizing laws to more government assistance tasks. This is line with the way that the law in itself is wasteful to the extent guaranteeing the requirement of moral and good commitments is concerned. Dynamic A basic gander at the root of government focuses at the genuine embodiment of the foundation. A few hypotheses layout the root of legislative issues or government. By and by, the agreement of social hypothesis is a lot of importance to the administrations dynamic job. Under the implicit understanding hypothesis, individuals from the general public met up and gave up their opportunities in return for request. So as to accomplish this target, the individuals set up an administration which was to oversee the state for their benefit. Among the key jobs given of this foundation was that of settling on choices in the interest of the individuals (Cremer 2009). Consequently the administrations most huge job is that of dynamic. The job of settling on a choice should be in accordance with the interests and estimations of the general public. This underscores the enormous pretended by the administration in guaranteeing an only society for all. Hence in settling on a choice the administration has a significant influence in implementing moral and good measures. Aside from upholding the law which is seen as the desire of the individuals, the administration has the power to settle on choice that influence the working of the general public. In this way in settling on these choices the legislature should place moral and good commitments in prime core interest. In this job the part of open trust exudes. The legislature has been given the open trust which must be reflected in each choice it makes. Along these lines open authorities must settle on choices that advance morals and ethical quality as well as speak to the equivalent. In settling on choices the administration should be guided by two head perspectives. As a matter of first importance is regard of the law. The law is the preeminent underwriter of profound quality, morals and equity. Consequently due significance ought to be allowed to the law during the time spent creation choices. Choices that are in opposition to the arrangements of the law ought to be debilitated. The law ought to be the shared factor of all administration choices. This will shield the individuals from pioneers with malicious goals. Another basic part of thought is that of moral thought past the law. This ought to be deciphered in a positive way to imply that the law ought to be maintained in high regard however ought not be the finish of morals. Certain parts of profound quality and morals are not settled in the law yet ought to be maintained in dynamic. This respects arrangements and different parts of administration. This calls for trustworthiness with respect to state authorities in the release of their obligations. Requirement For Appropriate Actions Initiative is a sensitive issue which includes a great deal of perspectives. Since initiative includes the assignments of vision, bearing and administration a great deal of care must be made to guarantee that moral and good; norms don't take a rearward sitting arrangement. The administration is offered with an overwhelming undertaking of guaranteeing request and equity in the general public. This is to be accomplished through the requirement of laws that speak to the moral and virtues of the general public. This is additionally done through the creation of legitimate and moral choices. The legislature in this way assumes an essential job in the entire idea of morals and ethical quality. Through its activities, choices and tasks the administration has a great deal of effect on the working of the general public. There is requirement for suitable activities with respect to the legislature so as not to sabotage morals and ethical quality (Kiel Lennick, 2007). Since the accomplishment of a general public relies upon the way wherein moral gauges are clung to, the administration authorities should be cautious in their activities in order to advance an equitable and efficient society. It is against this foundation that legislatures need to set up a few measures to guarantee that the part of morals and ethical quality play

The Secret Life of Bees Essay Example | Topics and Well Written Essays - 500 words

The Secret Life of Bees - Essay Example This story shows Lily’s battles through pre-adulthood with honey bees as the focal image of similarity between them: both looking for a mother figure (in Lily’s case) and a sovereign figure (in the bees’ case) to discover satisfaction throughout everyday life. Lily chose to gather the honey bees that she finds in her room in a container to demonstrate to her dad that they do exist. An anecdote about how her mom kicked the bucket some way or another offers assurance to Lily’s blame emotions. Moreover, she figures out how to keep little keepsakes of Deborah’s things in a little tin which she covered in the plantations. At the point when she gets dismal, similar to when her dad overlooked her forthcoming birthday, Lily uncovers the tin box as a sign that she needs consolation from her mom. Lily’s losing her mom at a young age at such horrendous occurrences left a void as a part of her character that should be filled. She is searching for a perpetual connection, a security, a feeling of protective and unequivocal love which isn't given by his dad. T-Ray was a monumental legitimate figure who was uncaring toward Lily’s sentiments †somewhat on the grounds that she helps him to remember Deborah, who was quite the skirt of leaving them when they irately battled before she inadvertently kicked the bucket. T-Ray was just worried of demonstrating how incredible he is and how every other person is under his purview. Lily’s experience with Rosaleen’s difficulty on being hailed to prison was instrumental in showing the flooding feeling of escaping to a progressively protected and secure spot which would give her adoration and love. This was approved when she discovered her container of honey bees unfilled. There were exercises on the truth of racial issues as introduced by Rosaleen’s experience and the dash of profound direction gave by Lily’s dependence on her mother’s dark Mary picture which demonstrates Tiburon, at the back. The message delineated a dream of bearing to where her mom was conceivable already in. Rosaleen, then again,

Identity in No Exit - Literature Essay Samples

In â€Å"Metafictional Characters in Modern Drama,† June Schlueter contrasts the metafictional character with the dramatic character. According to Schlueter, â€Å"drama presents a fixed identity, which in real life is a misnomer† (9). Metatheater differs from traditional theater because metafictional characters do not have fixed identities. The metafictional character is dual; it is both real and illusory, both actor and character. This rift between real and illusory extends to incorporate not just the duality of character and actor, but also the duality of the inner and outer self. In Sartre’s No Exit, the essential self (which in metatheater represents the actor) represents the inner self, and the role-playing self (which refers to the character in metatheater) represents the outer self. As the three sinners attempt to determine the proper balance between inner and outer self, they confront an existential crisis common to human nature: the search for an identi ty. In No Exit, this rift between actor and character is apparent when Inez asks Garcin and Estelle: â€Å"what’s the point of play-acting?† (17). (The characters are already in hell, so what is the point of pretending to be innocent?) Sartre’s use of the word â€Å"play-acting† reminds the spectator that actors play the characters. More importantly, however, the characters in No Exit are twofold because of the duality between inner and outer self. Inner self refers to the identity the characters imagine themselves to have. Outer self refers to the identity created by other people.According to Schlueter, â€Å"individual identity appears dependent upon individual perceptions, and since such perceptions vary among individuals, and even the perceptions of a single individual are inconsistent, so also does the identity of the person or character perceived vary† (10-11). The identities of the three sinners in Jean-Paul Sartre’s play, No Exit, ar e true to Schlueter definition or rather the lack of these three characters’ identities is true to Schlueter’s definition of the metafictional character. Inez, Estelle, and Garcin depend on one another to the point where they are no longer individuals. Inez strives to maintain an independent identity yet is unsuccessful because Garcin judges her. Garcin and Estelle consciously shy away from identity; Estelle looks to others to determine her appearance; and Garcin allows others to determine his soul. Inez values her inner self over her outer self. She tells Estelle, â€Å"I’m always conscious of myself in my mind. Painfully conscious† (19). She cannot maintain her own identity because she strives to be an individual. She is bothered by the fact that other people view her identity differently than she views it herself. Her frustration is evident when she accuses Garcin of â€Å"stealing† her face. Garcin can see her face, but Inez cannot because th ere are no mirrors. The fact that Inez accuses Garcin of â€Å"stealing† leads one to infer that she believes she is supposed to judge herself, not to be judged by other people. Inez’s pursuit of an identity is futile. What’s the point of attempting to maintain one’s own identity if others control it anyway? Unlike Inez, Estelle and Garcin decide against maintaining their own identity. They encourage others to determine their identity for them and thus place a higher priority on the outer self. Estelle lacks appreciation for the inner self; she says that â€Å"everything that goes on in one’s head is so vague, isn’t it? It makes one want to sleep† (19-20). She views herself in accordance with other people’s physical image of her. She says, â€Å"when I can’t see myself I begin to wonder if I really and truly exist† (19). When Inez acts as her mirror, Inez is able to convince her she has a pimple, when in fact she does not. Through Estelle, Sartre emphasizes the mysteriousness of identity. If one depends on other people for one’s identity, how can one know whether they are lying? Ultimately, it does not matter whether one’s identity is true or false. Reality is different from truth. An unreal illusion is often more true. For instance, Schlueter argues that the fictive dramatic character is truer than the realistic metaphysical character. Garcin’s identity is also mysterious. It is mysterious to him because he is not in control of it; he allows Inez to determine it for him. When Inez says his mouth looks grotesquely frightened, Garcin apologizes. He accepts Inez’s impression of him without question. Garcin is unwilling to decide whether or not he is a coward. Throughout the play, he asks Estelle and Inez if he is a coward for fleeing the country. He does not leave the room when the door opens because he waits for Inez to determine whether or not he is a coward. He t ells her, â€Å"If you’ll have faith in me, I’m saved† (44). Garcin has the opportunity to choose freedom when the door opens, yet he chooses to remain in hell because he chooses to avoid his problems. Garcin, Estelle, and Inez all lack identities, as shown by the rift between their inner and outer selves. The quest for identity is futile. Jean Paul-Sartre’s No Exit leaves the spectator in an existential crisis. Inez strives to be an individual but she cannot because others control her identity. From Estelle, the viewer learns that one’s identity may be based on lies that become true. From Garcin, one learns the freedom of identity comes with responsibility. Ultimately, this freedom of identity seems futile because of Inez’s failure to achieve her desired identity. Does identity even exist?

Technology And Its Effects On Society - 1800 Words

In today s society most people base their fear of crime on such things as theft, drug trafficking, or assault. These people do not realize that there is an ever growing problem today and, in fact, will be around as long as technology is increasing and the education per person of this growing tech is not as high as it should be. People are far more likely to be hacked than they are to be stolen from physically or mugged or shot. The reason for this being is that physical crimes such as break and enter, car theft, drug dealing and trafficking, assault, and petty theft are harder to accomplish a lot of the time and are a lot more risky and provide a larger chance to get caught and arrested. Whereas people could sit in there basement in†¦show more content†¦These hacks hacks were not used in any sort of harmful or criminal way (Devitt, 2001). Criminal hacking was only beginning to become a problem once more and more people got their own personal computers, today in society almost every home has a computer or device of some sort that has the potential to be hacked. There are several ways that technological devices can be infiltrated by hackers. People must educate themselves about the groups of hackers that are alive and operating under the radar without anybody even realizing it. There are several of these groups ranging from what they call â€Å"hacktivists† who are trying to prove that the government and other groups are more corrupt than we think, to slapstick hackers who hack just to show that they can and to joke around. First of all is a group called Lizard Squad, Lizard squad is a group of hackers that you particularly don’t want to be targeted by because they do very difficult things and make it seem simple. These include things such as shut down facebook, playstation network, twitter, xbox live, and tumblr just for the fun of it. They also took down the Malaysia Airlines website so that when people went to it, it redirected them to a page that said 404 plane not found. (Lizard Squad (n.d.) in Facebook [fan page] Retrieved May, 5, 2016 from https://www.facebook.com/NewLizardSquad/?fref=ts). Ther e are several tens of people in Lizard Squad and when

The American Red Cross Is A Humanitarian Based...

The American Red Cross is a humanitarian based organization created by Clara Barton in 1881. According to The RedCross.org, Barton was inspired to create the Red Cross because of her service trip in Europe were she was stationed as a nurse where she heard of a Swiss based Red Cross that treated wounded soldiers in the war. Barton admired their work and decided to start a branch in the United States. The Red Cross has blossomed into an organization that provides relief towards natural disasters, emergency assistance, and public health education. Up to date, the organization has currently 650 chapters and 36 blood drives across the United States ready to deliver assistance to any citizen in need. The Red†¦show more content†¦Elizabeth McLaughlin stated, Why then haven t these charities been able to get together and agree on one uniform application? Why haven t they able to get together and develop a quicker way for families to receive these funds? With victims such as McLaughlin, how do you attend to them? Here you have victims suffering from financial stability that can no longer afford to live their lives and now cannot receive assistance due to malfunctions. The financial officer at the time Jack Campbell believed the issue did not deserve to be blown into proportions. He told CBS news that his idea for progress is rigorous set of additional procedures and more national oversight. Some might say that is not enough, why was the chapters organized independently? The Red Cross is a large operating organization that attends to the U.S population and with the situation going on at New York at the time you would believe there would be some type of monitoring. Hurricane Katrina aftermath controversy The American Red Cross was yet again put to test when hurricane Katrina struck New Orleans leaving citizens stranded with little to no food and water. The Red Cross was reported to be chaotic at their locations, with refugees waiting in line to be attended to. According to NBC news, Red Cross dispatched their services to predominantly white areas leaving other refugees unattended with

Managing Inter-Organizational Partnership and Alliances

Question: Describe about the Managing Inter-Organizational Partnership and Alliances. Answer: Introduction The collaboration of two or more organizations means the conjugation of these organizations to achieve their goal. Working collaboratively, helps the organization to enhance their performance, products or services, skills and win new business. The organizations mainly collaborate on commercial ventures, as the development of new products or the penetration of new markets. There are different types of collaboration networks like business network, development network and regional business network. In this project, a case study is analyzed on the collaboration of Pentagon company and British Standards Institution (BSI) group. British Standards Institution is the national standard body of the United Kingdom[1]. BSI provides certification and standard related services to different business. It audits and improves certification to companies worldwide, thereby enhancing their management systems. Pentagon group is a network of franchised motor dealers across fifteen cities in the United Kingdom. Its accident repair business works with a variety of business works including manufacturers, insurance companies and fleet management companies. They aim at delivering the high level service. The collaboration between these two companies is the development network. Here, Pentagon company collaborates with BSI to achieve certification. This improvises the working of Pentagon and helps it to get acclaimed in the united kingdom[2]. The case study is divided into nine elements that are to be analyzed based on this collaboration. Each part would reflect on new information regarding this collaboration of two companies. The focus would be given on the understanding of these key issues, and how managerial steps could be taken by being the lead in the management system. Exploring Aims in Collaboration Before forming any collaborations, the core aim to collaborate must be set. The purpose can vary according to the needs of the two companies, yet that must be the primary focus before getting into any alliance[3]. The aim of forming an alliance could be financial aid, human capital, physical capital, intellectual capital, or developing a new process. The main motive must be clear so that the alliance is made with the suitable organization hat helps each other to fulfill their goal[4]. In the case study, Pentagon company, which deals with accident repair of automobiles are done, persists in a competitive market. Among all his competitors, pentagon company wanted to be chosen by famous insurance company or repairers. This would increase their want in the field, make them win the customer's focus. Being the managerial head of such a company, the basic aim would have been to get associated with such an organization which is well known. The organization should help in developing the quality and spread the name of the organization. It should be helpful in getting connected to various companies and repairers of branded automobiles manufacturers. On the other hand, BSI is an organization that is a non-profit association. It gets aligned with various SMEs and helps them get certified. With the various certifications that it provides, it helps these countries to grow. As the main purpose of this organization is to get into alliances with various organization, the main aim of the managerial head would be, to improve the offerings to the member alliances so that a relation of mutual benefit is shared. Expanding the national standard body services must be kept in focus with thoughtful leaders in uk. Developing the organization official publishing business into knowledge service providers should be an important goal so that more and more companies get attracted to such alliances thereby earning more revenue. Exploring aim in collaboration is the first step of getting into an alliance. Objectives must be set by both the organizations before entering into any alliance. That is the basic lesson for practise, so that both the companies are well aware of their reasons for getting into such collaborations. In this context, Edwin lockes goal setting theory of motivation can be implie. It tells the organization to fix the objectives as it would help the company to reach their goal efficiently.[5] Exploring structure in collaboration After getting the aims of collaboration fixed, the first step for business collaboration is to formulate an efficient structure related to the process of the collaboration[6]. It is important to identify the rules of engagement between the organizations of collaboration. Both the parties should agree to the structure. There are various stages of structuring the alliance as agglomeration, networking, coordinating, mobilizing, collaborating and sustaining. The companies should analyze all the steps beforehand, so that have an idea regarding the process the alliance between Pentagon company of automobiles repair and BSI, must be categorized regarding the above mentioned levels of structure. Being the leading head, it is a duty to organize such structures. At first, agglomeration is done, capability matrix is set up. Next step is networking, external and internal information is shared. The collaboration needs to establish leadership to support or facilitate the process. Next is coordinating the project planning. Membership protocols must be developed, identifying key stakeholders and working with them. Collaborating is the next step, where network management and allocation of members must be done. License agreement and royalties protocol are to be maintained. Sustaining the collaboration is the last step, where longer term goals must be analyzed, and research and development group should be made efficient[7]. New ways must be explored or der to maximize the profits to be earned from the collaboration of the organizations. It can be concluded, that structure helps in analysing a framework for the organizations. It helps to seek the pathway through which both the organization can move and seek the best of the alliance formed. The lessons for practise in this context and in similar context, is that both the organization must maintan a detail structure after coming into partnerships with each other. With the aim of the alliance kept in mind, the companies must use the various hierarchical steps that would initiate the process of the business. The Classical Organization Theory that had been developed in the 20th century is the best that could be implied in this situation as this would help the companies to get a guide towards framing the structure.[8] Exploring trust in collaboration Two countries when to enter into a collaboration, building trust on each other is one of the most important aspects of the alliance. Trust building loop is a concept that is developed around this idea. The initiation of a trust loop among the two organizations may be the reason for ambiguity and complexity of the collaboration, difficulty in clarifying aims, and managing risks. The sustainability of such loops depends on the constant changing dynamics of collaboration, power imbalance within a collaborative consent and the need to nurture for continuous efforts to sustain trust. Pentagon and BSI have entered into such a collaboration that requires both the organization to built-in trust for each other. Pentagon has collaborated in search of excellence in its field. It aims at achieving its target by getting certified. Whereas, BSI comes under an alliance with the hope of adding another client to its list. It could now focus on such companies that deal with automobiles. The organizations help each other to sustain their trust. It helps both of them to grow towards their goal. If there is no confidence among the organizations while entering into a collaboration, then the creation of an alliance is ineffective. When two companies collaborate, trust must prevail in them. Only then a successful collaboration system can be set.the lessons for practise in this context would be that be true to each other. Both the companies should always keep in mind that both are in need of each other. The partnership would be incomplete without one of the organization. So maintaining trust on each others behalf and being true to each other would help the alliance to succeed. Karen Stephensons Quantum Theory of trust can be implied in this context. According to tis social network theorist, the act of connecting to a trusted business partner triggers a feeling of assurance in them[9]. Exploring power in collaboration Power is a term that has been taken as a concept of domination of one over the other. This term has many positive aspects. In a collaboration of two organization, power plays an important role. Three terms related to power should be discussed here,' power over,' ' power to', and 'power for.'[10] Power over is a negative aspect of power. Its shows the dominance of one over the other. When an organization has power over the other, then the weak one has many drawbacks in the alliance. Power over concept differentiates between the two companies and hence, it makes brings inequality, injustice, and misconceptions between the two. Power to is a positive idea, where both the organizations are in joint action. Both the organization has the power to make a difference in such an association. Power within refers to that alliance where self-identity, confidence, and awareness is perceived[11]. In the case study, the form of power that dwells in the association of Pentagon company and BSI is the form of power to and power within. If there would have been power over, then it would be exercised by BSI over the Pentagon. Pentagon would not be able to survive such an alliance. Hence, to proceed a smooth functioning of the inter-organization association, power to and power within should be assessed. Power maintains a form of self-satisfaction, which shows that there is equality of opportunity for both the companies. None of the organizations is superior to the other in any sense. Both has the capability to make a difference. Exploring collaboration of power in the alliance must be checked always. It should be seen that none of the organization is either above or below. They both maintain an equal position in the partnership. This would help the organization to improve and strengthen their alliance as they would not get suppressed by the behaviour of the other. Both of them would have an equal say in the decisions to be taken nd have the equal status. The Theory Of Fred Luthans can be implied is such a context, where different roles of power is shown with advantages and limitations.[12] Exploring learning in collaboration The flow of knowledge in a collaboration is an important attribute. When two companies are held in an association, their basic aim is to fulfill their goals with the help of each other. A lot can be learned from each other, by being in an alliance. There are some concepts regarding the learning attribute in collaboration. There are three types of learning done, selfish learning, sideline learning, and sharing. The sidelining attribute can be defined as that attribute which may be a nonconsiderate learning. The learning may happen unintentionally. Selfish learning may be defined as that type of learning where one of the partners receive the knowledge but do not provide its partner with the knowledge. These two forms of learning are nit suitable when an alliances formed. The only way of learning that is feasible is sharing. Sharing is further divided into two, as sharing exchanging and sharing exploring. Sharing exchanging is a bi or multi-dimensional knowledge flow where the partners are appreciated for being a source of knowledge. Whereas sharing exploring is a knowledge outflow where knowledge is shared and new valuable ideas are created. In the case study, Pentagon and BSI forms a sharing exploring from of relationship. Both the organizations share valuable information and knowledge to each other and thereby new ideas, to enhance business, is created. Pentagon to increase the size of its business, seeks knowledge and advice of BSI, whereas, BSI on the other hand, takes information from the Pentagon, to know about their type of industry. That would help BSI to expand its business to the automobiles repair sector of the country. Hence, the lesson from this context could be concluded that learning is an important aspect in partnership that must be shared among the oartners. There must be no selfishness among the members of the alliance. This would rather harm the collaboration than prove to be advantageous for one. Informations must be shared among the mebers freely and a friendly relation must be maintained. The theory of Organizational Learning (OL) by Argrys and Schon must be followed in this context. It would help the organizations to get hold of the advantages of learning and how it must be shared among the member. Exploring identity in collaboration Identity is an important factor in the inter-organizational collaboration. Identity can be crystallized for a period of time. Identities can be so deep-rooted that they are difficult to change. The companies must be identified well to get attracted by customers in their field[13]. Pentagon, to achieve such identification, certifies itself with BSI Kitemark. It enables the company to get acknowledged among the customers. It helps the organization to get differentiated from others. It acts as an award over those who do not behave it. It creates an identity for the company to carry forward its business. As more and more companies tie itself to the BSI, BSI gets a noticeable response from different sectors worldwide. It helps the companies to identify BSI because of its valuable collaborations. The aim of improving identity is an important aspect of the organization. Hence, in this context the lesson that must be learnt is that the organization should be acknowledged with such an association that helps each of them to make an identity of its own. The identity must help the organizations to stand out of the crowd, to help them to excel in their fields. The theory that can be implied in the context of exploring identity in collaboration is the identity management theory as stated by erving groffman. It teaches the ability to manage ones identity by facing the work and by acknowledging various factors for identity management. Exploring leadership in collaboration Leadership in collaboration is practiced in business with great success. It is found useful where there is no one in charge to monitor the proceeds. Among the most important attributes of leadership in collaboration, some are problem solving and decision making efficiency, someone who steers the group in the direction of achieving the goals, leadership of process rather than the team[14]. Being the leading head of the managerial department, by being in collaboration, it must be kept in focus that dealing with new challenges and problems should be the basic aim. New ventures would be introduced, to which the workers are unaccustomed to. Hence monitoring such processes must be done by the leader. The leader must not be leading the group; it must be leading the process. Dominating people is not considered to be an ethical nature of the lead. BSIs leadership, on the other hand, would be in analyzing the new sector, knowing it whereabouts and gaining knowledge as to how this industry works. This would help the organization to tie up with other organization of the same field, thereby initiate in spreading their businessa. A good leadership guidance helps the organization to follow the structured path of the business. Lessons to be learnt in this context is that the leader must not rule over the others, rather it must monitor them. Clarifying doubts, helping the others to analyse work and taking out the best from the employess must be done accurately. The modern trait theory, behavioural theory and the contingency theory must be implied in this context. It would help the leaders o the organization to know about their roles in the organization[15]. Exploring success in collaboration Success in collaboration is acknowledged by everyone. There are many variables; that accelerates the success of the system. These could be institutional support, the presence of a facilitator, compatible collaboration, acquisition of knowledge, relevant skills, and knowledge[16]. The success of cooperation depends on substantive outcomes, new milestones, collaborative process, recognition and pride for the collaborative practice and supporting useful performance research. Pentagon faced by lots of competitors, involves itself in various practices, that would help them to achieve their aims. With the help of the collaboration, pentagon company got acknowledged by royal sun alliance and the Royal Bank of Scotland. In many cases, the BSI Kitemark is necessary for being accepted as an approved body shop. Pas 125 provided a methodology that could be easily applied to ensure best practice vehicle repair. It has helped to attract more customers. To acknowledge success in collaboration, both the organization must fulfil their aims and follow their path structured. The organizations must enhance skills, certifications and recognitions and perform quality work to seek high success rate. The Concept Key Success Factors : Theory And Method By Klaus Grunert And Charlotte Ellegard must be implied here. All the theories and practices regarding the success of organizations must be considered.[17] Managing to collaborate An efficient management plan ensures the efficiency of the system. It includes standard methods of doing various things, and where these methods would operate. The management system depends on a number of factors such as the goal of the organization, the steps needed to run the organization, degree of freedom needed by people at all levels in order to do their jobs well, resources available to carry out the management plan, and how well does the management plan fits in the philosophy and mission of the organization.[18] Management clarifies the roles and responsibilities of everyone in the organization so that everyone knows what they are supposed to do, it divided the work of the organization in reasonable and equitable ways, so that everyones job is not only defined , but feasible, increases accountability, ensures necessary tasks assigned to the appropriate staff members, and creates a time schedule to get them accomplished. It even helps the organization define itself. Acting as the leading head of the pentagon company, it must be ensured that the certification is taken from such a company which is well known and most demanded. Its must ensure that the people abide by the new rules and process of being in collaboration, all the steps and structures of collaboration are followed. This efficient functioning of the system would help the company to grow towards its target. On the other hand, being the manager head of the business standard institution company, the possible duties would change. The manager should be more efficient in gathering new companies for collaboration. Showing the advantages of being collaborated with BSI. Targeting those sectors that are still new for the company as it would help the company to grow globally. The managers of both the organizations must choose or design a managements model that would comfortably fit the organization and will accomplish their respective purposes. There ust be skilled people in order to efficient operate of the management structure. A comprehensive set of policies and procedures must be made to cover the essential management areas such as people, money , supplies and equipment, activities , and relations with the outside world[19]. The theory that must be implied here is the theory Managing to collaborate: the theory and practice of collaborative advantage by Huxham, Chris andVangen (2005). Conclusion Inter-organizational collaboration of two organizations is one of an efficient way to enhance the business of each company. Collaborations are very active to get aids from other organization. This helps to step out of the competition level. In this project, a case study analysis is done on the collaboration of Pentagon company and British Standards Institution group. A clear structure of the various elements of collaboration is considered. Important factors in collaboration such as the aim, structure, trust, power, learning, identity, leadership, success, and management are analyzed. The above mentioned nine elements have a crucial impact on the collaboration and hence as the leading head of the management department, these case are briefly discussed. On the successful collaboration between these two organizations, Pentagon company received a BSI Kitemark which serves as an important factor to be acknowledged as a body shop for automobile repair. This collaboration has helped BSI company to get more clients in the field of vehicle repair. 88% of the consumers trust in BSI Kitemark certified companies.[20] Therefore, obtaining the certification of this company helped Pentagon to enhance its business goals. Therefore, a clear view is set as to how collaboration between two companies helps to raise the standards and revenue of both the organizations. References Northouse, P.G., 2015.Leadership: Theory and practice. Sage publications. Luthans, F., 2012. Psychological capital: Implications for HRD, retrospective analysis, and future directions.Human Resource Development Quarterly,23(1), pp.1-8. Siemens, G., 2014. Connectivism: A learning theory for the digital age. Huxham, C. and Vangen, S., 2013.Managing to collaborate: The theory and practice of collaborative advantage. Routledge. Macdonald, S. and Chrisp, T. (2005). Acknowledging the purpose of Partnership , Journal of Business Ethics, 59 (4). Wong, A., Tjosvold, D. and Yu, Z.Y. (2005). Organizational partnerships in China: Self-interest, goal interdependence, and opportunism , Journal of Applied Psychology, 90 (4), 782-791. Gray, B. (1985) , Conditions facilitating interorganizational collaboration. Human Relations, 38, 911-936. Kanter, R.M. (1994) Collaborative advantage: The art of alliances , Harvard Business Review , 72, 96-108. Hoon-Halbauer, S.K. (1999) Managing Relationships Within Sino-Foreign Joint Ventures, Journal of World Business, 34, 4 p.344-399. Medcof, J.W. (1997) Why Too Many Alliances End in Divorce , Long Range Planning, 30, 5 p.718-732. Child, J. (2001) , Trust: The fundamental bond in global collaboration.Organizational Dynamics, 29(4), 274-88. Das, T. K. and Teng, B.-S. (2001) , Trust, control, and risk in strategicalliances: An integrated framework , Organization Studies, 22(2), 251-283. Sundaramurthy, C. and Lewis, M. (2003) , Control and collaboration: Paradoxes of governance, Academy of Management Journal, 28(3), 397- 415. Vaara, E., Tienari, J., Piekkari, R. and Santti, R. (2005) Language and circuits of power in a merging multinational corporation , Journal of Management Studies, 42(3), 595-623. Huxham, C. and Hibbert, P. (2008). Manifested attitudes: Intricacies of interpartner learning in collaboration, Journal of Management Studies, 45(3), 502-529. Hibbert, P. and Huxham, C. (2005) , A little about the mystery: Process learning as collaboration evolves , European Management Review, 2, 5969. Inkpen, A. C. and Tsang, E. W. K. (2005), Social capital, networks and knowledge transfer, Academy of Management Review, 30,14665.Feyerherm, A.E. (1994), Leadership in collaboration: a Longitudinal study of Two interorganizational rule-making groups, Leadership Quarterly, 5(3/4), 253-270. Judge, W.Q. and Ryman, J.A. (2001),The shared leadership challenge instrategic alliances: Lessons from the U.S. healthcare industry Academy ofManagement Executive, 15, 2, 71-79. Pentagon-group.co.uk. (2016), Accident Repairs And Bodyshop. Car Repair Quotes.. [online] Available at: https://www.pentagon-group.co.uk/accidentrepair [Accessed 27 Aug. 2016]. Bsigroup.com. (2016). Standards, Training, Testing, Assessment and Certification | BSI Group. [online] Available at: https://www.bsigroup.com/ [Accessed 27 Aug. 2016]. Locke, E.A. and Latham, G.P. eds., 2013.New developments in goal setting and task performance. Routledge. Shafritz, J.M., Ott, J.S. and Jang, Y.S., 2015.Classics of organization theory. Cengage Learning. Cicală, I.R., Dragomir, D. and Dragomir, M., 2013. DETERMINING THE CRITICAL SUCCESS FACTORS OF A ROMANIAN FURNITURE MANUFACTURER, AS PART OF A STRATEGIC PLANNING INITIATIVE.Review of Management Economic Engineering,12(1). [1] Bsigroup.com. (2016). Standards, Training, Testing, Assessment and Certification | BSI Group. [online] Available at: https://www.bsigroup.com/ [Accessed 27 Aug. 2016]. [2] Pentagon-group.co.uk. (2016), Accident Repairs And Bodyshop. Car Repair Quotes.. [online] Available at: https://www.pentagon-group.co.uk/accidentrepair [Accessed 27 Aug. 2016]. [3] Huxham, C. and Vangen, S., 2013.Managing to collaborate: The theory and practice of collaborative advantage. Routledge. [4] Gray, B. (1985) , Conditions facilitating interorganizational collaboration. Human Relations, 38, 911-936. [5] Locke, E.A. and Latham, G.P. eds., 2013.New developments in goal setting and task performance. Routledge. [6] Macdonald, S. and Chrisp, T. (2005). Acknowledging the purpose of Partnership , Journal of Business Ethics, 59 (4). [7] Wong, A., Tjosvold, D. and Yu, Z.Y. (2005). Organizational partnerships in China: Self-interest, goal interdependence, and opportunism , Journal of Applied Psychology, 90 (4), 782-791. [8] Shafritz, J.M., Ott, J.S. and Jang, Y.S., 2015.Classics of organization theory. Cengage Learning. [9] Siemens, G., 2014. Connectivism: A learning theory for the digital age. [10] Child, J. (2001) , Trust: The fundamental bond in global collaboration. Organizational Dynamics, 29(4), 274-88. [11] Das, T. K. and Teng, B.-S. (2001) , Trust, control, and risk in strategic alliances: An integrated framework , Organization Studies, 22(2), 251-283. [12] Luthans, F., 2012. Psychological capital: Implications for HRD, retrospective analysis, and future directions.Human Resource Development Quarterly,23(1), pp.1-8. [13] Sundaramurthy, C. and Lewis, M. (2003) , Control and collaboration: Paradoxes of governance, Academy of Management Journal, 28(3), 397- [14] Huxham, C. and Hibbert, P. (2008). Manifested attitudes: Intricacies of interpartner learning in collaboration, Journal of Management Studies, 45(3), 502 -529. [15] Northouse, P.G., 2015.Leadership: Theory and practice. Sage publications. [16] Hibbert, P. and Huxham, C. (2005) , A little about the mystery: Process learning as collaboration evolves , European Management Review, 2, 5969. [17] Cicală, I.R., Dragomir, D. and Dragomir, M., 2013. DETERMINING THE CRITICAL SUCCESS FACTORS OF A ROMANIAN FURNITURE MANUFACTURER, AS PART OF A STRATEGIC PLANNING INITIATIVE.Review of Management Economic Engineering,12(1). [18] Judge, W.Q. and Ryman, J.A. (2001),The shared leadership challenge in strategic alliances: Lessons from the U.S. healthcare industry Academy of Management Executive, 15, 2, 71-79. [19] Huxham, C. and Vangen, S., 2013.Managing to collaborate: The theory and practice of collaborative advantage. Routledge. [20] Bsigroup.com. (2016). Standards, Training, Testing, Assessment and Certification | BSI Group. [online] Available at: https://www.bsigroup.com/ [Accessed 27 Aug. 2016].